World Housing Encyclopedia
an Encyclopedia of Housing Construction in
Seismically Active Areas of the World




an initiative of
Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI) and
International Association for Earthquake Engineering (IAEE)


HOUSING REPORT
Stonework building with wooden timber roof


Report # 114
Report Date 17-01-2005
Country IRAN
Housing Type Stone Masonry House
Housing Sub-Type Stone Masonry House : Rubble stone without/with mud/lime/cement mortar
Author(s) Masoud N. Ahari, Alireza Azarbakht
Reviewer(s) Svetlana N. Brzev

Important
This encyclopedia contains information contributed by various earthquake engineering professionals around the world. All opinions, findings, conclusions & recommendations expressed herein are those of the various participants, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, the International Association for Earthquake Engineering, the Engineering Information Foundation, John A. Martin & Associates, Inc. or the participants' organizations.

Summary

Stonework buildings are a common type of rural construction in many parts of Iran (Figure 32). It is widely used in the mountainous areas because of the ease of attaining the building material. More than 71,000 stonework buildings were built in 1968-1972 in comparison to 54,000 brick masonry buildings in these years [1]. Unfortunately these buildings are often found in highly seismic parts of Iran (see maps on WHE webpage for Iran). Buildings of this type are up to two stories high, with height/width aspect ratio on the order of 0.3-0.5. The building materials consists of stone, wood, mud mortar and straw. The major elements of these systems are stonewalls which carry both gravity and lateral loads. These walls consist of stone or stone ballast with mud mortar and straw. For reasons of thermal insulation the thickness of these walls is not less than 50 centimetres (usually 70 centimetres). Details of wall are shown in Figures 11 to 20. The roof includes wooden joists and a set of secondary joists which are plastered with a thick layer of mud (Figures 21 and 22). Different views of this kind of building are shown in Figures 1 to 3. Also a typical building view, plan and layout are shown in Figures 4 to 10. Weak points of this construction type are: the presence of a heavy roof; inadequate behaviour of the walls under out-of-plain forces (Figures 23 and 24); poor shear capacity of the mortar; inadequate connection between roof and walls; inadequate connection between intersecting walls; and lack of diaphragm action in floors and roof where the roof elements (wooden beams) do not work together in earthquakes and may collapse (Figures 25 and 27). In general, this kind of structure is frequently used as a house and stable in mountainous villages, but its earthquake performance is not acceptable. Any proper rehabilitation techniques may save many people's lives.
 

1. General Information

Buildings of this construction type can be found in In most village buildings in the mountain regions of Alborz and Zagros (Figure 32).  This type of housing construction is commonly found in rural areas.  

This kind of building is not practiced in major cities but only in rural cities and mountainous villages. The major reason for the popularity of this form of construction is that in mountainous regions, stone mines are easily accessible. Two kind of stones are used in these stonework buildings: 1-Rubble stone, a by-product of the mining industry (Figure 12). 2-Carcass stone, which comes from riverbeds (Figure 11)
.  

This construction type has been in practice for more than 200 years ago.

Currently, this type of construction is being practiced.  .  


Figure 1a: Typical Building View [3]
 

Figure 1b: Typical Building View [3]
 

Figure 2a: Typical Building Wall View [3]
 

Figure 2b: Typical Building Wall View [3]
 

Figure 3: Typical Building Roof View [3]
 

Figure 4: View of common stone masonry house type
 

Figure 5: Elevation and a Plan of a Typical Building [7]

Figure 6: Elevation and a Plan of a Typical Building [7]

Figure 7: Elevation of a Typical Building [7]
 

Figure 8: View and Plan of a Typical Building [7]
 

Figure 9: View and a Plan of a Typical Building [7]

Figure 10: Two story stone masonry house on a slope

Figure 11: Carcass Stone [1]
 

Figure 12: Rubble Stone [1]
 

Figure 13: Stone Walls Foundation
 

Figure 14: Walls with Rubble Stone [1]
 

Figure 15: Seismic Behavior of Rubble Stone [9]
 

Figure 16: Seismic Behavior of Carcass Stone [9]
 

Figure 17: Stone Settlement [1]
 

Figure 18: Vulnerable Walls (Buckling of outer stones) [1]

Figure 19: Adequate walls [1]
 

Figure 20: Stone Units Arrangements [1]
 

Figure 21: Typical Detail of Connection between Wall and Roof

Figure 22: Roof Details (using secondary wood joists)

Figure 23a: Typical external walls damage in Firoozabad-Kagoor earthquakes [3]

Figure 23b: Typical external walls damage in Firoozabad-Kagoor earthquakes [3]

Figure 24a: Typical internal walls damage in Firoozabad-Kagoor earthquakes [3]

Figure 24b: Typical internal walls damage in Firoozabad-Kagoor earthquakes [3]

Figure 25: Typical roof damage in Firoozabad-Kagoor earthquakes [3]

Figure 26a: Typical roof damage in Firoozabad-Kagoor earthquakes [3]

Figure 26b: Typical roof damage in Firoozabad-Kagoor earthquakes [3]

Figure 27: Total collapse of stonework building in Firoozabad-Kagoor earthquakes [3]

Figure 28: Retrofitting components
 

Figure 29: R.C. Band bellow Roof Beams
 

Figure 30: Providing R.C.
 

Figure 31: Polythene sheet placements
 

Figure 32: Distribution of Stonework Buildings in Iran

2. Architectural Aspects

2.1 Siting 
These buildings are typically found in flat, sloped and hilly terrains.  They have common walls with adjacent buildings.  Usually they are constructed side by side and there is no distance between them 

2.2 Building Configuration 

A typical plan of this kind of building is shown in figure 3.  Most windows are about 120X120 centemetres and doors are 200X100 centemetres.  

2.3 Functional Planning 

The main function of this building typology is single-family house.  Usually this kind of building is used for living but sometimes when the building is located at the foot of a slop, the ground storey has less surface area than the top one and is used for depot reservoir or as a stable.  In a typical building of this type, there are no elevators and 1-2 fire-protected exit staircases.  In one-story buildings there is just one door and in two-story buildings there is one door in front of building and another one behind the building.  

2.4 Modification to Building 

Usually there is no modification.  

3. Structural Details

3.1 Structural System 
 
MaterialType of Load-Bearing Structure#SubtypesMost appropriate type
MasonryStone Masonry
Walls
1Rubble stone (field stone) in mud/lime
mortar or without mortar (usually with
timber roof)
2Dressed stone masonry (in
lime/cement mortar)
Adobe/ Earthen Walls3Mud walls
4Mud walls with horizontal wood elements
5Adobe block walls
6Rammed earth/Pise construction
Unreinforced masonry
walls
7Brick masonry in mud/lime
mortar
8Brick masonry in mud/lime
mortar with vertical posts
9Brick masonry in lime/cement
mortar
10Concrete block masonry in
cement mortar
Confined masonry11Clay brick/tile masonry, with
wooden posts and beams
12Clay brick masonry, with
concrete posts/tie columns
and beams
13Concrete blocks, tie columns
and beams
Reinforced masonry14Stone masonry in cement
mortar
15Clay brick masonry in cement
mortar
16Concrete block masonry in
cement mortar
Structural concreteMoment resisting
frame
17Flat slab structure
18Designed for gravity loads
only, with URM infill walls
19 Designed for seismic effects,
with URM infill walls
20Designed for seismic effects,
with structural infill walls
21Dual system – Frame with
shear wall
Structural wall22Moment frame with in-situ
shear walls
23Moment frame with precast
shear walls
Precast concrete24Moment frame
25Prestressed moment frame
with shear walls
26Large panel precast walls
27Shear wall structure with
walls cast-in-situ
28Shear wall structure with
precast wall panel structure
SteelMoment-resisting
frame
29With brick masonry partitions
30With cast in-situ concrete
walls
31With lightweight partitions
Braced frame32Concentric connections in all
panels
33Eccentric connections in a
few panels
Structural wall34Bolted plate
35Welded plate
TimberLoad-bearing timber
frame
36Thatch
37Walls with bamboo/reed mesh
and post (Wattle and Daub)
38Masonry with horizontal
beams/planks at intermediate
levels
39Post and beam frame (no
special connections)
40Wood frame (with special
connections)
41Stud-wall frame with
plywood/gypsum board
sheathing
42Wooden panel walls
OtherSeismic protection systems43Building protected with base-isolation systems
44Building protected with
seismic dampers
Hybrid systems45other (described below)



3.2 Gravity Load-Resisting System 

The vertical load-resisting system is confined masonry wall system.  The roof of the building is constructed with joists spaced at 20-50 centimetres which transfer loads from the roof to the walls (500-600 kilogram per square meter) and then walls tranfer loads to the ground directly. Wall thickness is between 45-70 centimetres. These walls have no foundations.  

3.3 Lateral Load-Resisting System 

The lateral load-resisting system is confined masonry wall system.  Walls carry the inertia forces produced by the roof mass. These loads must be transfered from the walls to the ground by in-plane behavior of the walls, but usually there is no proper path for adequately transferring these seismic loads to the ground in stonework buildings. Floors and roofs do not work as rigid diaphragms and there is rarely connection between the roof components (joists and secondary joists). Heavy floors and roofs are supported on walls without any connection (Figure 21). These deficiencies may cause separation and collapse of roof components as shown in Figures 25 and 26: 1- Walls collapse under out of plane loads. 2- Improper arrangement of stone units may cause buckling of outer stones in walls (Figures 15, 18 and 23a). 3- Walls collapse because of poor shear capacity of mortar; also there is not enough cohesion between stone units and mud mortar.  

3.4 Building Dimensions 

The typical plan dimensions of these buildings are: lengths between 0 and 0 meters, and widths between 0 and 0 meters.  The building has 1 to 2 storey(s).  The typical span of the roofing/flooring system is 3-4 meters.  The typical storey height in such buildings is 2.5-3 meters.  The typical structural wall density is none.  .  

3.5 Floor and Roof System 


MaterialDescription of floor/roof systemMost appropriate floorMost appropriate roof
Masonry Vaulted
Composite system of concrete joists and
masonry panels
Structural concreteSolid slabs (cast-in-place)
Waffle slabs (cast-in-place)
Flat slabs (cast-in-place)
Precast joist system
Hollow core slab (precast)
Solid slabs (precast)
Beams and planks (precast) with concrete
topping (cast-in-situ)
Slabs (post-tensioned)
SteelComposite steel deck with concrete slab
(cast-in-situ)
TimberRammed earth with ballast and concrete or
plaster finishing
Wood planks or beams with ballast and concrete or plaster finishing
Thatched roof supported on wood purlins
Wood shingle roof
Wood planks or beams that support clay tiles
Wood planks or beams supporting natural
stones slates
Wood planks or beams that support slate,
metal, asbestos-cement or plastic corrugated
sheets or tiles
Wood plank, plywood or manufactured wood
panels on joists supported by beams or walls
OtherDescribed below

The roof includes wooden joists and a set of secondary joists which are plastered with a thick layer of mud (Figures 21, 22 and 3).  

3.6 Foundation 


TypeDescriptionMost appropriate type
Shallow foundationWall or column embedded in
soil, without footing
Rubble stone, fieldstone
isolated footing
Rubble stone, fieldstone strip
footing
Reinforced-concrete isolated
footing
Reinforced-concrete strip
footing
Mat foundation
No foundation
Deep foundationReinforced-concrete bearing
piles
Reinforced-concrete skin
friction piles
Steel bearing piles
Steel skin friction piles
Wood piles
Cast-in-place concrete piers
Caissons
OtherDescribed below



4. Socio-Economic Aspects

4.1 Number of Housing Units and Inhabitants 
Each building typically has less than 10 housing unit(s). 1 unit in each building. The number of inhabitants in a building during the day or business hours is less than 5 persons.  The number of inhabitants during the evening and night is less than 5 persons.  

4.2 Patterns of Occupancy 

Typically there is one family per housing unit that may sometimes include grandparents.  

4.3 Economic Level of Inhabitants 


Income classMost appropriate type
a) very low-income class (very poor)
b) low-income class (poor)
c) middle-income class
d) high-income class (rich)



Ratio of housing unit price to annual incomeMost appropriate type
5:1 or worse
4:1
3:1
1:1 or better


What is a typical source of
financing for buildings of this
type?
Most appropriate type
Owner financed
Personal savings
Informal network: friends and
relatives
Small lending institutions / micro-
finance institutions
Commercial banks/mortgages
Employers
Investment pools
Government-owned housing
Combination (explain below)
other (explain below)

  Because this kind of building is placed in mountainouse areas, the owners of them are ususlly peasants or shepherd.  In each housing unit, there are no bathroom(s) without toilet(s),  1 toilet(s) only and  no bathroom(s) including toilet(s).   

Usually toilet is placed outside of housing unit.
.  

4.4 Ownership 

The type of ownership or occupancy is renting and outright ownership.  

Type of ownership or
occupancy?
Most appropriate type
Renting
outright ownership
Ownership with debt (mortgage
or other)
Individual ownership
Ownership by a group or pool of
persons
Long-term lease
other (explain below)


5. Seismic Vulnerability

5.1 Structural and Architectural Features 
Structural/
Architectural
Feature
StatementMost appropriate type
TrueFalseN/A
Lateral load pathThe structure contains a complete load path for seismic
force effects from any horizontal direction that serves
to transfer inertial forces from the building to the
foundation.
Building
Configuration
The building is regular with regards to both the plan
and the elevation.
Roof constructionThe roof diaphragm is considered to be rigid and it is
expected that the roof structure will maintain its
integrity, i.e. shape and form, during an earthquake of
intensity expected in this area.
Floor constructionThe floor diaphragm(s) are considered to be rigid and it
is expected that the floor structure(s) will maintain its
integrity during an earthquake of intensity expected in
this area.
Foundation
performance
There is no evidence of excessive foundation movement
(e.g. settlement) that would affect the integrity or
performance of the structure in an earthquake.
Wall and frame
structures-
redundancy
The number of lines of walls or frames in each principal
direction is greater than or equal to 2.
Wall proportionsHeight-to-thickness ratio of the shear walls at each floor level is:

Less than 25 (concrete walls);

Less than 30 (reinforced masonry walls);

Less than 13 (unreinforced masonry walls);
Foundation-wall
connection
Vertical load-bearing elements (columns, walls)
are attached to the foundations; concrete
columns and walls are doweled into the
foundation.
Wall-roof
connections
Exterior walls are anchored for out-of-plane seismic
effects at each diaphragm level with metal anchors or
straps
Wall openingsThe total width of door and window openings in a wall
is:

For brick masonry construction in cement mortar : less
than ½ of the distance between the adjacent cross
walls;

For adobe masonry, stone masonry and brick masonry
in mud mortar: less than 1/3 of the distance between
the adjacent cross
walls;

For precast concrete wall structures: less than 3/4 of
the length of a perimeter wall.
Quality of building materialsQuality of building materials is considered to be
adequate per the requirements of national codes and
standards (an estimate).
Quality of workmanshipQuality of workmanship (based on visual inspection of
few typical buildings) is considered to be good (per
local construction standards).
Maintenance Buildings of this type are generally well maintained and there
are no visible signs of deterioration of building
elements (concrete, steel, timber)
Other



5.2 Seismic Features
 

Structural ElementSeismic DeficiencyEarthquake Resilient FeaturesEarthquake Damage Patterns
Wall The combination of stone and mortar has low tensile and shear strength, especially for out-of-plane seismic effects. Sometimes openings such as walls and windows reduce the strength of the bearing walls. The perimeter walls are not sufficiently connected at the corners, and behave as seperate elements, which causes damage in the wall corner connections.  During earthquakes in the mountainous regions of Iran, there is extensive damage and many casualties in these buildings due to wall collapses. Figures 23 and 24 show typical damage of stone walls from earthquakes. 
Frame (columns, beams)No Frame exists. No Frame exists. No Frame exists. 
Roof and floorsUsually they consist of heavy materials that behave as flexible diaphragms in earthquakes, which undermines the connections between the stone walls and the diaphragm. Also there is not a tie beam for integrity.  After wall failure, the heavy roof generally collapses. Figures 25 and 26 show evidence of this phenomenon. 
Other   

Total collapse of this kind of building occured during several past earthquakes in Iran. Figure 27 shows one of these catastrophes.  

5.3 Overall Seismic Vulnerability Rating 

The overall rating of the seismic vulnerability of the housing type is A: HIGH (i.e., very poor seismic performance), the lower bound (i.e., the worst possible) is A: HIGH (i.e., very poor seismic performance), and the upper bound (i.e., the best possible) is A: HIGH (i.e., very poor seismic performance).  

Vulnerabilityhighmedium-highmediummedium-lowlowvery low
  very poorpoormoderategoodvery goodexcellent
Vulnerability
Class
ABCDEF


5.4 History of Past Earthquakes
 

DateEpicenter, regionMagnitudeMax. Intensity
1985 Ardabil 5.8 VII 
1990 Manjil 7.6  
1992 Lordekan VII 
2004 Firoozabad 6.3  


6. Construction

6.1 Building Materials 

Structural elementBuilding materialCharacteristic strengthMix proportions/dimensionsComments
WallsStone.Unknown  
FoundationNo foundation   
Frames (beams & columns)No frame   
Roof and floor(s)Joists with mud mortar and strawUnknown  


6.2 Builder 

The builder lives in this construction type.  

6.3 Construction Process, Problems and Phasing 

First, the ground is excavated with a width of 80-100 centimeters and a depth of 50-100 centimeters for the wall perimeter. Next, the walls are constructed from bottom of this cavity. On rare occasions, a wooden column is used at the intersection of stone walls. Wooden beams are then placed on top of walls at a 20-50 centimeter spacing distance. The top surface of the beams is covered with thiner wooden beams or board(plank). Finally the roof is plastered with mud in two seperate stages to achieve a total thickness of 20-30 centimeters.  The construction of this type of housing takes place in a single phase.  Typically, the building is originally not designed for its final constructed size.  There is no special design & drawings for this kind of construction.  

6.4 Design and Construction Expertise 

This kind of building is constructed by people lacking formal construction expertise. Sometimes expert bricklayers build these buildings with some special architectural features in the walls and roof but they are not certified.  Engineers or architects are not present in the design/construction of this housing type.  

6.5 Building Codes and Standards 

This construction type is not addressed by the codes/standards of the country.  

6.6 Building Permits and Development Control Rules 

This type of construction is an engineered, and not authorized as per development control rules.  

These buildings are old.  Building permits are required to build this housing type.  

6.7 Building Maintenance 

Typically, the building of this housing type is maintained by Owner(s).  

6.8 Construction Economics 

per m2 of built-up area expressed using a currency used in the region, and, if possible, an equivalent amount in $US in the brackets e.g. 200 Rs/m2 (5 $US/m2).  

7. Insurance

Earthquake insurance for this construction type is typically not available.  For seismically strengthened existing buildings or new buildings incorporating seismically resilient features, an insurance premium discount or more complete coverage is not available.  

8. Strengthening


8.1 Description of Seismic Strengthening Provisions

 


(CONTINUED: FINISHING THE ROOF AND PARAPETS PROCEDURE ) Step FOUR Re-laying the roof on the band 1- Lay the wooden joists and where found necessary, the Ferro-cement channels, on separate rooms as far as possible. 2- Hold these elements to the R.C. band at ceiling level by the wires projecting out of the band (see step two). 3- Build the stone walls to the required height. 4- Affix the wooden planks to the wooden joists with nails. Step FIVE (Figure 31) Finishing the roof The following suggestions are not essential to retrofitting scheme but are desirable for achieving good water proofing of the roof and parapets so that rain water ingression into the walls is prevented. This will maintain the dry strength of mud mortar in the walls. a) Finish the roof by using water proof non-erodible mud plaster as evolved by the CBRI, given below: Cutback is prepared by mixing bitumen 80/100 grade kerosene oil and paraffin wax in the ratio of 100:20:1 for 1.8 kg of cutback, 1.5 kg bitumen is melted with 15 grams of wax and this mixture is poured in a container having 300 ml kerosene oil with constant stirring till all ingredients are mixed. This mixture can now be mixed with 0.03 cubic meters of mud mortar for application as plaster. A plaster thickness of 20-25 mm is suggested. b) The stone parapet top and the walls can be finished on the inside face by using galvanized chicken wire mesh held to the wall by means of nails and plaster over using mud plaster or cement sand 1:6 mix. The galvanized mesh should pass through the space between wooden frames and the walls.  

8.2 Seismic Strengthening Adopted 



8.3 Construction and Performance of Seismic Strengthening 



Reference(s)

  1. Stone Walls (Report in Persian)
    Iranian Management and Planning Organization 1376  
     
  2. Retrofitting of Stone Houses in Marathwada Area of Maharashtra
    Arya,A.S.
    University of Roorkee, March 1994 
     
  3. Firoozabad-e-Kojour earthquake reconnaissance report
    Eshghi,S. and Zare,M.
    International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, 1383 (In prepartion)  
     
  4. Lordekan earthquake report
    Chahar Mahal va Bakhtiary and F. Nateghi Elahi
    International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, 1370  
     
  5. Manjil earthquake report
    Roodbar,S.E.
    International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, 1369  
     
  6. Golestan-Ardebil earthquake report
    Ashtiani,M.G.
    International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, 1377  
     
  7. Building and housing types of Zanjan according to architects and materials
    Bonyade maskane enghelabe eslami, 1372  
     
  8. Building and housing types of Gilan according to architects and materials
    Bonyade maskane enghelabe eslami, 1372  
     
  9. A simple pictorial guideline for resistance construction of rural houses against earthquake (Report in Persian)
    Hosseini,B., Alemi,F. and Khaki,A.
    International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology 2005 
     
  10. Maps refered to "Geology Survey of Iran"
     
  11. Seminars, Conferences, Personal communications and practical involvements
     

Author(s)

  1. Masoud N. Ahari
    PhD student, IIEES
    No. 20 Sabzali Allay Taslihat Square Shahid Madani Ave., Tehran  , IRAN
    Email:noorali@iiees.ac.ir 
     
  2. Alireza Azarbakht
    PhD student, IIEES
    No 370 Alvand 4 St. Arash St. Shahrake Gandarmery, Tehran  , IRAN
    Email:alireza_azarbakht@yahoo.com 
     

Reviewer(s)

  1. Svetlana N. Brzev
    Instructor
    Civil and Structural Engineering Technology,  British Columbia Institute of Technology
    Burnaby BC V5G 3H2, CANADA
    Email:sbrzev@bcit.ca  FAX: (604) 432-8973