by Kerstin Lang, Hugo Bachmann
This building type was mainly constructed as residential buildings in the second half of the 19th century until the beginning of the 20th century in the vastly expanding city of Basel, but also in other Swiss cities. The buildings are made of unreinforced masonry with timber floors, are four to five stories high and are attached to each other. The unreinforced masonry walls are usually made of simple stone (more or less regularly cut) or brick masonry, the thickness of the stone masonry walls being larger. The mortar used is usually lime mortar. In some cases, a mixed masonry was used, especially at the ground floors, with larger, well cut stones for the outer layer of the façade walls and simple stones or bricks arranged behind. The buildings are rather regular in plan and elevation. However, the timber floors are often not anchored to the masonry walls and the front and back façades usually have rather large openings for the windows whereas the side walls are solid walls used as fire division wall. The seismic performance of these buildings is expected to be rather poor.
Report # 119 : Urban residential buildings of the 19th century in the city of Basel
Report # 116 : Timber Frame Brick House with Attic
by Amit Kumar, Jeewan Pundit
This type of house is used for residential purposes. The building type under study has been picked the from central part of India (Madhya Pradesh), but it is found throughout India with small or large variations. Timber is primarily used for the frame structural elements but due to an acute shortage of timber, this construction type is not practiced anymore. Various components of the building change from place to place depending on climate, socio-economic conditions, availability of material, etc. Timber frames, placed in longitudinal and traverse directions, are filled with brick masonry walls. The floor structure is made of timber planks. Most of the buildings are found to be rectangular in shape with few openings. The roofing material is usually light when it is made from galvanized iron sheets. Seismic performance of a perfectly framed building is very satisfactory. Existing old structures, however, require maintenance and strengthening (Figure-1a,1b). It has been observed that nominal cost will be incurred for introducing earthquake resistant features.
Report # 113 : “Casa Torre” construction: multistory tower masonry with stone pillars and wood or arched beams
by Mauro Sassu, Chiara Cei
This construction originated during the Middle Ages in response to the threat of military invasions. The building plan is a square lattice, 5-7 meters, formed by three or four floors, with one room on each floor, and a total height of 15-20 m. It is a common technique found in Pisa but also found frequently in many municipalities of Tuscany and adjacent districts. The structure of the building is supported by four stone columns connected by arches (circle or oval) or by beams at each floor; the floor is supported by a series of wood beams (especially pine) with wood tables and/or clay blocks. The upper floors of the earlier historic buildings often contained a wood balcony supported by cantilevered wood beams. Some balconies were fully enclosed structures with clay-tile roofing. The entrance on the first floor could be accessed by means of a detachable wood staircase.
Report # 112 : Unreinforced brick masonry residential building
by Qaisar Ali
In Peshawar and adjoining areas (in northern Pakistan), the most popular residential construction is a single- or double-story unreinforced masonry building with 9-inch-thick, solid burnt-brick walls and a 5- to 6-inch reinforced-concrete roof slab. Sometimes, however, 4.5-inch solid brick walls are also used as load-bearing walls. The layout of these dwellings is usually regular, mostly rectangular, having horizontal dimensions in the range of 30 ft x 60 ft or 60 ft x 90 ft, etc. Building height rarely exceeds 35 ft. Wall connections at the corners are achieved through proper toothing. Lintels, approximately 6- to 9-inches deep, with a width equal to the wall thickness, are provided above openings. In a relatively engineered construction, however, the lintel beam runs throughout the perimeter. Similar residential buildings are also found in other cities of Pakistan, for example, in Islamabad and Lahore. In Karachi, Pakistan’s largest city, concrete frame structures with concrete-block infill walls are most often used.
Report # 99 : Traditional Nawari house in Kathmandu Valley
by Dina D’Ayala, Samanta S. R. Bajracharya
The traditional newari house is usually of rectangular plan shape and developed over three storeys. The depth of the plan is usually about six metres with façades of various widths but most commonly between 4 to 8 metres (see also Korn 1976, and NSET-Nepal 2000). The organisation of the house is usually vertical, over 3 storeys, with a spine wall running through the height, creating front and back rooms. At the upper storey the spine wall is sometimes replaced by a timber frame system so as to create a larger continuous space. The staircase is usually a single flight to one side of the plan. The typical interstorey height is quite modest, between 2.20 and 2.50 m., including the floor structure. The bathroom, where present, is found at ground floor, while the kitchen is on the top floor, usually directly under the roof. The first floor is traditionally used as bedrooms, while the second floor is used as living room and for visitors’ reception. There are essentially two types of clusters of houses, either in long arrays, or around a court or chauk . In some cases the two types of clusters are adjacent with some units in common. In the arrays each house has front and back façade free. The construction of each unit is usually independent so that the facades are not continuum over party walls but each unit forms a separate cell. In such cases connection between façades and sidewalls are usually very good. The most interesting characteristic of these buildings both from an architectural and seismic point of view is the presence of the timber frame. Usually at ground floor, on the facade, to provide an open space for workshops or shops. It is also found internally at the upper storeys. In some cases the masonry only forms the outer shell while the internal structure is all made of timber elements. In the better built example of this typology there are a number of construction details, usually made of timber, which, coupled with the brick masonry walls, substantially improve the seismic performance of the overall structure. These features are best preserved in older examples. Currently these buildings are substantially being altered by use of western materials and technology, typically adding concrete frames as upper storeys. This type of intervention highly increases the vulnerability of the existing buildings.
Report # 92 : Historic, braced frame timber buildings with masonry infill (‘Pombalino’ buildings)
by Rafaela Cardoso, Mario Lopes, Rita Bento, Dina D’Ayala
Pombalino buildings (see Figures 1, 2, 3 and 4) are historic masonry buildings that can be identified by the presence of a three-dimensional timber structure (named “gaiola pombalina”), which is enclosed in internal masonry walls above the first floor. The roofs are built with timber trusses clad with ceramic tiles and the floors are made of timber boards laid on timber joists. Ground floor walls are roughly dressed stone masonry supporting a system of vaults made of clay tiles, with stone arches. Foundations are made of short and small-diameter timber piles connected by a timber grid. These buildings were built after the 1755 earthquake when fear of new earthquakes led to the enforcement of anti-seismic provisions, such as establishing a maximum number of stories and introducing an interior timber structure called “gaiola.” The buildings originally were mixed-use with commercial enterprises on the ground floor and residences on the upper floors. During the 20th century, most Pombalino buildings underwent substantial refurbishment when they were converted and occupied entirely by banks and companies. For the buildings that have maintained their original uses, the main problems result from poor maintenance.The expected collapse mechanisms due to earthquake actions are the overturning of facades (out-of-plane) or shear failure at the plane of the walls at ground floor level (global shear mechanism), leading to a global collapse mechanism. Typical seismic strengthening of these buildings includes the introduction of a concrete/steel ring beam at the level of the roof eaves. The introduction of steel elements/pre-stressed cables or of anchors connecting parallel masonry walls is also common. Steel elements are also used to connect detached timber elements from the floors and gaiola to the masonry. New techniques applying new materials like Fibre Reinforced Polymers (FRP) are also used to increase the strength of the connections of timber elements that compose the gaiola.
Report # 91 : Single-storey brick masonry house (EMSB1)
by Mehedi Ansary
This is a one-story brick masonry house of fired bricks with cement or lime mortar; roof is either GI sheet or another material. These houses can be seen throughout Bangladesh. During the 1918 Srimangal, 1930 Dhubri, and other recent earthquakes, this type of housing suffered heavy damage. Houses with a continuous lintel suffered less.
Report # 85 : One family one storey house, also called “wagon house”
by Maria D. Bostenaru, Ilie Sandu
This is one of the oldest housing types in Romania with a statistically significant number of buildings in existence. The overwhelming majority of residential buildings in Romania have been built after 1850. Today. only churches remain from the previous “post-Byzantine” period. Issues relating to the age of historical buildings of cultural value are also discussed within the report. This urban housing type is particularly common in Romanian towns, especially in the southern part of the country, such as in the former Wallachia. It is a middle-class family house constructed from the end of the 19th century until the Second World War. The houses were designed to be semidetached, but have been constructed individually. Thus, in most of cases, the adjacent building, separated structurally, is a totally different construction type, The design of this housing is astonishingly homogeneous, especially considering the relatively lengthy time span the construction has been practiced. The single-unit housing is generally characterized by a rectangular, elongated-shape plan, with an entrance on the long side. The load-bearing system consists of two longitudinal unconfined brick masonry walls and several transversal unconfined brick walls, usually 28 cm thick, which form a wagon-like arrangement — hence the name of this building type. The horizontal structural system is made out of wood plates and joists separated by a distance of 0.70 m. Buildings of this type have been affected by damaging earthquakes in November 1940 and in March 1977, and by two earthquakes of lower magnitudes in 1986 and 1990. They performed well except for the occurrence of some minor cracking in the plaster.
Report # 84 : A single-family, two-storey house with brick walls and timber floors
by Maria D. Bostenaru, Ilie Sandu
This type of urban housing was constructed in Romania in the 1930s as single-family housing for the middle class. Typical buildings described in this report are one- or two-story buildings with load-bearing masonry walls. These buildings called “vila” in Romania are characterized by a rectangular plan and are usually semidetached; they share a common wall with the adjacent building. A great variety of buildings exist of this structural type. The building type described in this report has load-bearing brick masonry walls constructed of mud mortar. The floor structure consists of timber planks and joists. These buildings are located in an area well-known to be earthquake-prone. The epicenter is located close to Vrancea and earthquakes exceeding magnitude 7.0 on the Richter scale recur every 30 to 35 years. The latest earthquake of this severity was the March 1977 Vrancea earthquake (M 7.2). However, the building type described in this report is located in the Bucharest area and although affected by the November 1940 Naruja (Vrancea) earthquake (M 7.4), it usually performed well during the 1940 and 1977 earthquakes. The most common type of damage was in the form of cracks and falling chimneys. Some of the older buildings of this type have been affected by other past earthquakes. Because this construction is common for many Romanian buildings of the “Brâncovenesc” architectural style, new retrofit techniques have been developed in recent years (in addition to the techniques used after the 1977 earthquake).
Report # 80 : Low-strength dressed stone masonry buildings
by Ravi Sinha, Vijaya R. Ambati
Construction of stone masonry buildings using easily available local materials is a common practice in both urban and rural parts of India. Stone masonry houses are used by the middle class and lower middle class people in urban areas, and by all classes in rural areas. In rural areas, these buildings are generally smaller in size and are used as single-story, single-family housing. In urban areas, these buildings are up to 4 stories high and are used for multifamily housing. This is a typical load-bearing construction, in which both gravity and lateral loads are resisted by the walls supported by strip footing. If the locally available stone is soft, dressed (shaped) stones are commonly used and can be chiselled at low- or moderate cost. Mud or lime mortar has been used in traditional constructions; however, more recently, cement mortar is being increasingly used. Because soft sandstone is readily available in the Kutch region of Gujarat in the western part of India, stone block masonry constructions are widely used for both single- and multi-story constructions. These houses are usually built by local artisans without formal training and the resulting constructions are structurally weak and incapable of resisting large seismic forces. In the Kutch region, which was affected by the 2001 Bhuj earthquake, this construction type is commonly used with a gable end timber roof truss or RCC roof slabs. Thousands of these houses collapsed in the 2001 Bhuj earthquake resulting in the deaths of large numbers of people. This construction type is inherently unsuitable for areas of moderate-to-high seismic hazard, such as the Kutch region of Gujarat.